GO BACK TO HOME PAGE HERE
Judicial
Qualifications Commission Complaint (against Judge Marni A Bryson)
-
Made by Mark Robbins against Judge Marni A
Bryson (Delray Beach Court # 7)
-
I asked for $5,000 each (max in small
claims court) from Christine Fortis and Andrew Migatz (a couple) for slander
per se (per se means that one does not have to prove damages; falsely accusing
someone of a felony falls into this category)
-
They, in what may be drug induced
psychoses, falsely accused me of approximately 25 crimes. Yet they never called the police regarding these. I have committed no crimes and I
barely knew them (the existence of “meth” use makes this easier to understand).
Beginning: 1/09/19
AM Judge Marni A Bryson violated the statement on the pre-trial hearing notice which says, ""The
defendants MUST appear in court on the date specified in order to avoid a
default judgment.” The defendants DID NOT SHOW UP and I did not
receive the default judgments of $5,000 each from Christine Fortis and Andrew
Migatz for slander per se. They accused me of crimes such as attempted homicide
and sex trafficking. I did not even know their last names when I was (out of
the blue) served with 2 restraining orders (This ONLY makes sense when you know
that there is alcohol, tranquilizers, heroin, and "meth" in play
causing many likely hallucinations). I personally have 32 years of sobriety and
have never been convicted of a crime.
NOTE
: The
hearing centered around the easily verifiable slander per se accusations made
against me. These false accusations were made within the restraining orders
filed against me and outside of them. PLEASE NOTE... the restraining orders
were never actually litigated as Fortis and Migatz realized they couldn't prove
allegations that were not true and never happened.
To dismiss the two cases ($5,000 each) cases, the
defendants are REQUIRED to be present and to furnish motions to dismiss on
their own. The defendants were not present yet Judge Bryson took 20 minutes to
research on their behalf during the hearing. Recall - this was a pre-trial
hearing and the Judge assumed the role as at the attorney for the defendants
who failed to show up.
The pre trial hearing notice said: “The Case will not
be tried at this time.” Yet
Bryson litigated the case that day without the defendants present! She asked me
how I could prove damages and I correctly told her that I did not have to prove
damages in a slander per se case.
WHAT HAPPENED NEXT WAS ONE OF THE MOST SEVERE EXAMPLES OF
JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT IMAGINABLE. Bryson
- during the hearing - went behind closed doors to allegedly look up "per
se" law. But she did so much more. She searched for case law that
would be sympathetic to the "no
show" defendants (see copies).
She searched for case law blindly. By this I mean she
did not see the false accusations made against me... nor was she aware of how I
had planned to present my evidence (at the trial). Not only did she not follow
the "no litigation" instructions... she appeared from the behind the
courtroom with 2 dismissal letters. I HAD NO OPPORTUNITY to defend myself.
The case law she presented was insufficient because it
did not include statements made outside of the restraining orders. Thus the case
law she cited was not applicable.
I then rightfully complained that she was she was
acting as the attorney for the "no show" defendants.
SHE THEN EXPLODED IN ANGER.
SHE SCREAMED AT ME:
GET
OUT!! I WILL HAVE YOU ARRESTED!!
SHE THEN SLANDERED ME IN FRONT OF THE ENTIRE COURTROOM.
SHE YELLED: "YOU
ALREADY HAVE 10 ARRESTS." (the
reality is I have had 3 in my life with zero convictions. My record is clean).
But what is most disturbing is that she took part in a
"dirt digging" mission on me - while my hearing was active - and used
it against me. This is misconduct of the
greatest degree.
She clearly lacks the requisite ethics or temperament
to be a Judge and I ask for her permanent removal. IT IS ALL ON TAPE. Please match
my words against what is on the tape. Mark Robbins
No comments:
Post a Comment