Sunday, May 28, 2017

Judge Marni Bryson complaint sent to JQC

GO BACK TO HOME PAGE HERE

Judicial Qualifications Commission Complaint (against Judge Marni A Bryson)

-        Made by Mark Robbins against Judge Marni A Bryson (Delray Beach Court # 7)
-        I asked for $5,000 each (max in small claims court) from Christine Fortis and Andrew Migatz (a couple) for slander per se (per se means that one does not have to prove damages; falsely accusing someone of a felony falls into this category)
-        They, in what may be drug induced psychoses, falsely accused me of approximately 25 crimes. Yet they never called the police regarding these. I have committed no crimes and I barely knew them (the existence of “meth” use makes this easier to understand).
Beginning:  1/09/19   AM    Judge Marni A Bryson violated the statement on the pre-trial hearing notice which says, ""The defendants MUST appear in court on the date specified in order to avoid a default judgment.” The defendants DID NOT SHOW UP and I did not receive the default judgments of $5,000 each from Christine Fortis and Andrew Migatz for slander per se. They accused me of crimes such as attempted homicide and sex trafficking. I did not even know their last names when I was (out of the blue) served with 2 restraining orders (This ONLY makes sense when you know that there is alcohol, tranquilizers, heroin, and "meth" in play causing many likely hallucinations). I personally have 32 years of sobriety and have never been convicted of a crime.

NOTE : The hearing centered around the easily verifiable slander per se accusations made against me. These false accusations were made within the restraining orders filed against me and outside of them. PLEASE NOTE... the restraining orders were never actually litigated as Fortis and Migatz realized they couldn't prove allegations that were not true and never happened.

To dismiss the two cases ($5,000 each) cases, the defendants are REQUIRED to be present and to furnish motions to dismiss on their own. The defendants were not present yet Judge Bryson took 20 minutes to research on their behalf during the hearing. Recall - this was a pre-trial hearing and the Judge assumed the role as at the attorney for the defendants who failed to show up. 

The pre trial hearing notice said:  The Case will not be tried at this time.”  Yet Bryson litigated the case that day without the defendants present! She asked me how I could prove damages and I correctly told her that I did not have to prove damages in a slander per se case.

WHAT HAPPENED NEXT WAS ONE OF THE MOST SEVERE EXAMPLES OF JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT IMAGINABLE. Bryson - during the hearing - went behind closed doors to allegedly look up "per se" law. But she did so much more. She searched for case law that would  be sympathetic to the "no show" defendants (see copies). 

She searched for case law blindly. By this I mean she did not see the false accusations made against me... nor was she aware of how I had planned to present my evidence (at the trial). Not only did she not follow the "no litigation" instructions... she appeared from the behind the courtroom with 2 dismissal letters. I HAD NO OPPORTUNITY to defend myself.

The case law she presented was insufficient because it did not include statements made outside of the restraining orders. Thus the case law she cited was not applicable.

I then rightfully complained that she was she was acting as the attorney for the "no show" defendants.

SHE THEN EXPLODED IN ANGER.

SHE SCREAMED AT ME:  GET OUT!!  I WILL HAVE YOU ARRESTED!!


SHE THEN SLANDERED ME IN FRONT OF THE ENTIRE COURTROOM. SHE YELLED: "YOU ALREADY HAVE 10 ARRESTS."   (the reality is I have had 3 in my life with zero convictions. My record is clean).

But what is most disturbing is that she took part in a "dirt digging" mission on me - while my hearing was active - and used it against me. This is misconduct of the greatest degree.

She clearly lacks the requisite ethics or temperament to be a Judge and I ask for her permanent removal. IT IS ALL ON TAPE. Please match my words against what is on the tape.      Mark Robbins

No comments:

Post a Comment