2016 -2017 Four Bar Complaints
(1)
Complaint against Mark Lowry: Theft of $2500.
(2)
Complaint against Mark Lowry. Serving me with papers
(for an action) illegally.
(3)
Complaint against Mark Lowry: Lying in his
response to my bar complaint.
(4)
Complaint against Carla Lowry:
Extortion. She was representing her ex-husband in small
claims court. The extortion took place in mediation as I was extorted
into signing an agreement that was brought about under the most extreme duress.
The duress was brought about by the illegal service of papers imposed
upon me just minutes before by Mark Lowry which would have forced me to defend
myself in another county (Palm Beach to Broward) on four hours’ notice. I was
given no details of the allegations and had no time to seek legal help. Perhaps
surprisingly, In Carla Lawry’s response to my extortion allegations she offered
no rebuttal.
(1)
Complaint against Mark Lowry: Theft of $2500.
The
words “Paid $2500” and “Retainer” can be deciphered from this
“chicken scratch” contract on the back of his business card in October 2016.
This was the only documentation received from him. This occurred in a parking
lot around 10 PM. Mark Lowry had at this time moved away from my apartment
complex.
A) Attorney Mark Lowry told me that by
paying cash that he could contact the State Attorney expediently and likely have
the charges dropped.
B) After 11 days of non-action I called
Mark Lowry and he still had not contacted the State Attorney to have the
charges dropped. My legitimate fear was that he was “sandbagging” so he could
be paid more at a trial.
C) I then fired Mark Lowry and hired the
Boca Raton firm of Lavalle, Brown, and Rogan who quickly had the charges
reduced and ultimately dropped.
D) Mark Lowry promised me that I would
receive a professional, typed, and legitimate retainer agreement
very soon. I never received it.
E) His chicken scratch “contract” had
the word “retainer” on it. No contract was ever signed indicating that the fees
were non-refundable (as required by law).
F) I was never given an invoice
of work performed and I wasn’t told the hourly rate.
G) I was never told that the $2,500 was
“burned through” and he needed more money .
HE) SIMPLY KEPT IT ALL OF THE RETAIMER. HE STOLE FROM ME.
H) When I confronted Mark Lowry with
stealing from me he threatened me by warning. me “this will not end well for
you, Mark (Robbins).”
I) The firm of Lavalle, Brown, and
Rogan directed me to file a bar complaint against Mark Lowry.
(2)
Complaint against Mark Lowry: ILLEGAL
SERVICE OF ACTIONABLE ITEM.
Above: SAME DAY HEARING in Fort Lauderdale at 1:30
PM on February 22, 2017
A)
While waiting in Judge Panse’s court room on
02/22/17 for mediation for the $2,500 retainer that I allege Attorney Mark
Lowry stole from me, Attorney Mark Lowry approached the Sheriff and pointed to me
sitting in the gallery. I was then given papers indicating I had to be in Fort
Lauderdale for cyberstalking charges (filed by Attorney Mark Lowry) in four
hours. (Per Florida Bar instructions, I had summoned Mark Lowry
solely/only to work out our issues prior to filing a complaint. I was simply
following directions. I stalked no one.)
B) The firm of Lavalle, Brown, and
Rogan later informed me that that the “service” was illegal. It was illegal
because I am to be provided 20 days’ notice. I WAS GIVEN SAME DAY 4 HOURS NOTICE and was given no
allegations to respond to.
C) The firm of Lavalle, Brown, and
Rogan also explained to me that the “service” was illegal because one
cannot serve one in court for a future action (cybertheft) while in court for
another existing action (the $2500 theft).
(3)
Complaint against Mark Lowry: Lying in his
response to my bar complaint. Details have been provided to the Florida
Bar.
(4)
Complaint against Carla Lowry:
EXTORTION. (NOTE: In Carla Lowry’s response to this bar
complaint, she stated in writing that she would offered not respond
to my allegations of extortion described below. Instead she used a “method of
distracting” by arguing that the “service” to me, giving me four hours, was
somehow proper.
A) She was representing her ex-husband
(Mark Lowry) in small claims court for mediation (Judge Panse; morning of
February 22, 2017) regarding the $2,500 I assert Mark Lowry stole from me,
B) Here was the deal that was offered
to me that I will demonstrate clearly meets the elements of
extortion.
1) I would allow Mark
Lowry to keep the $2,500
2) I would remove the
bar complaint filed against him
3) I would state in
writing (to the Bar) that I was happy with Mark Lowry’s performance.
4) IN RETURN… They
would “continue” the action (give me more than four hours notice) regarding the
hearing to take place the same day at 1:30 PM in Judge Kaplan’s court room in
Fort Lauderdale.
C) EXTORTION I signed an
agreement UNDER DURESS and an AGREEMENT I WOULD NEVER SIGN
UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES. Put simply, it was last second surprise… one
big CON JOB… a dirty trick
that the included the necessary elements for extortion. Duress and fear was applied in these ways:
1) I was under duress
because the “illegal service” gave me just 4 hours to prepare
when I would later learn from Lavalle, Brown, and Rogan that I had to be
legally given 20 days’ notice.
2) I was under duress because
I did not understand the charges in that I did not know whether it was a criminal
charge or a civil charge.
3) I was under duress
because I did not understand the charges because the papers I was served with
were bereft of any specific or written allegations.
4) I was under duress
because I was to be force to attend a hearing in another county in front of
a Judge that Mark and Carla Lowry claimed to know (thus adding to my fear
which increased the pressure on me signing whatever they put forth.)
5) I was under duress
because I had no time to get legal representation.
6) I was under duress
because I was afraid of the word “stalking” going on my record in any form. The
word “stalking” has a horrible and creepy connotation to it… a
connotation that has never been associated with someone with a clean record
like myself.
7) I was under duress
because I was startled and “frozen” by the circumstances I was placed in. To
use street terms… I was “jumped” whereas Mark and Carly Lowry had their
extortion scheme planned out well in advance.
D) THEAGREEMENT I WAS PRESSURED INTO SIGNING WAS
ILLEGAL ON ITS FACE. In retrospect, I was asked to commit a crime. I signed my bar
complaint under penalty of perjury. If I retracted my bar complaint and
stated lies about Lowry’s performance (claiming I was happy with his work), I
would be guilty of perjury. Thus, I did not abide by a contract that was
null and void the second it was signed (on the face of it).
No comments:
Post a Comment