QUESTIONS:
NEPOTISM
Does it make you
feel uncomfortable to know that Leighton spends time with City Solicitor at the solicitor's NJ home? Did you know that Leighton is related to
city solicitor Bill Vinsko (cousins)? Leighton is also cousins with Gerard Dessoye.
Glodzik: Private client of Mayor Tom Leighton’s real estate business
Glodzik: Private client of William Vinsko’s law
firm
From the 06/27/13 Times Leader: Among
the complaints was a lawsuit filed by Tyler and Antonia Hammond whose property
is next to the former bakery . The Hammonds
claimed the city engaged in “what could
be considered insider trading” by having the property pulled from Luzerne
County’s tax sale list in September 2009 to make way for
Glodzik who they say was a private client of Mayor Tom Leighton’s real estate business and assistant city attorney William Vinsko’s law firm .
LEIGHTON'S DEFENSE
TEAM:
Do you believe,
like I do, that the solicitors effectively serve as Leighton’s legal
defense team? Whose bidding should be done? The city of Wilkes-Barre’s? Or Mayor Thomas Leighton’s?
WHAT HAVE THEY
HIDDEN?
Does it make you
upset that tax dollars pay for solicitors Tim Henry and Bill Vinsko? Do you
believe that the city solicitors had a duty to call out or stop Leo Glodzik and the seven year “CARS FOR
CASH” scam? Does anyone honestly believe they were ignorant this
whole time? A private client of Vinsko's?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In May 2013 I asked
Bill Vinsko (on facebook) “Please explain to the city (WB) why you were
disbarred in NJ?”
Vinsko replied: “Dear Mr. Robbins, I was not disbarred in
NJ. Get your facts straight before you get sued for defamation.
Take this as a warning. I am not going to roll over like some people do
with your ridiculous garbage. Bring it on.”
Had Attorney Vinsko simply explained to me
that his license was revoked because he had failed to keep up with the required
payments (7 years)… then this would have served as a satisfactory explanation.
Instead Bill and Brian Vinsko went “nuclear.” They sent me an extremely
threatening letter meant only to intimidate. See below.
They threatened a lawsuit over me asking a
public official – City solicitor Bill Vinsko – ONE QUESTION!!!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Times Leader article says: Attorney William Vinsko filed a Writ of Summons Friday (May 17) in County Court. The filing indicated legal action has begun but did not contain specifics. Robbins has been critical of Vinsko, attorney for the city of WB, and others in handling complaints against LAG Towing, the city contracted towing company. A message left with Vinsko was not returned, Robbins sent an e mail to Vinsko and others Friday asking him for an explanation on the status of his law license in NJ. His license was administratively revoked, making him ineligible to practice in the state. “I think it is a scare tactic,” Robbins said. “I am not worried about it.”
Found
on line:
NJ Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection Sep
28, 2009
ID
030742001 William E Vinko Jr 253 S Franklin St WB Pa
18701
Year
ADM = 2002
LICENSE
ADMINISTRATIVELY REVOKED
|
License Administratively Revoked-The attorney is not
currently eligible to practice law in
New Jersey for one or more reasons, including
failure to pay the annual attorney
assessment to the New
Jersey Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection, failure to register
with IOLTA or
maintain IOLTA accounts, or otherwise failing to meet the requirements
of Rule
1:21-1(a).Administrative ineligibility is not the result of discipline, but
attorneys
who are
administratively ineligible are not allowed to practice law in New
Jersey.
Administratively Ineligible – The attorney is not
currently eligible to practice law in
New Jersey for one or
more reasons, including failure to pay the annual attorney
assessment to the New
Jersey Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection, failure to register
with IOLTA or
maintain IOLTA accounts, or otherwise failing to meet the requirements
of Rule
1:21-1(a).Administrative ineligibility is not the result of discipline, but
attorneys
who are
administratively ineligible are not allowed to practice law in New Jersey.
No comments:
Post a Comment